Why should the Prophet 600 firmware upgrade be revisited?





It's all about hardware...

I have only recently added a Sequential Circuits Prophet 600 to my (predominantly analog) synthesizer collection - and it was love at first sound. Advanced patch design features is something I enjoy, especially when the raw material you can work with is high quality - in the case of a synthesizer the raw material is oscillators and filters. While I am quite open to DCO and hybrid architectures, the Prophet 600's bare analog hardware immediately convinced me: 6 voices, two voltage controlled oscillators per voice and a 24db low pass filter all based on Curtis chips. Cross modulation, oscillator sync and oscillator to cut-off frequency modulation! 

... and software.

Almost everything else inside the Prophet 600 is software controlled: reading all dials, buttons and the keyboard, display and UI logic, voice assignment, envelopes, LFO, tuning, MIDI in/out, etc. In the original version all this was done by the legendary Zilog Z80 micro-processor. I never owned one or tried it out, as I bought my Prophet 600 already equipped with the modified Teensy+ 2.0 processor and the GliGli firmware and the previous owner didn't have the Z80 anymore. However, I have heard and read that the Z80 was just underpowered for that task and that it was steppy and unresponsive. The only thing I can say is that with the GliGli upgrade the synth sounds amazing. 

What is missing?

Being technically minded, I looked for background information on the project. It is an open source project, with all code available and reasonable documentation. I did, however find the following situation: 

First, the only formal release of the Prophet 600 upgrade by GliGli is version 2.0. After that, significant further development took place in 2015 leading up to a release candidate for version 2.1. That version was feature complete but lacked adequate / updated documentation, so it was never properly released, although it is openly available and some more explorative musicians use it. Nevertheless, I found that many users are still using version 2.0, even though the non-released version 2.1 featured things many significant improvements and also a sequencer (even polyphonic) which the version 2.0 doesn't have. The one I bought had version 2.0 installed on it.

Second, there is an active fanbase discussing bugs and missing features. Among the drawbacks was still noticeable steppiness, unstable sequencer / arpeggiator speed and conflicts between internal and MIDI pitch bend. There were desired features such as a local off mode for MIDI integration and discussions about softer mod wheel action and modified arpeggiator patterns.

Short, there is not only a need to bring the development to a proper close in the form of well documented release. Things have evolved since. There is also the potential to close some gaps, to organize structured testing and to generally incorporate the feedback from over 5 years of community experience. On top of this, the overhaul of the project code base means that the work is secured for some more years and the newer compilers also offer better optimization.

I think a new Prophet 600 GliGli based release is feasible and useful. This is what this blog is about. I will send regular updates on the work here. 


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ready to go: firmware v2022 + patch collection

Image
The v2022 firmware is completed and ready for download! There is even a collection of 100 patches compiled from dedicated contributions of Prophet-600 users (and myself) and including some selected Z80 patches. Official download page:  Prophet-600 v2022 firmware + patch collection + documentation Share your opinion on the firmware and the patches here. I will provide some means of structured feedback in the next months to collect your experience out in the field. Then there is also the list of great feature ideas on the backlog which need user prioritization. So if you want to stay informed or even get involved please watch this space or follow my blog.
Read more

It gets better: Prophet 600 v2022 RC1 (first release candidate)

While I intended to basically release the beta 2022 (2) and only do the smallest and most urgent fixes (hoping of course there would not be any) some very important code changes did came up which now lead up to the improved first release candidate v2022 RC1 ( download ). What happened and what is new?  Apart from those aforementioned small corrections (thanks to the contributors!) there are 2 new features and one really exciting major fix.  The 2 selected features that "sneaked in"were 1) vibrato has now the option to modulate only one of the two oscillators (parameter 222) and 2) the LFO can now be re-triggered when a new key is played (parameter 111) Now to the major fix "tuned pitch shift" : the poly-mod envelope pitch shift of OSC A as well as the LFO pitch shift of OSC A and B are now fully tuned and harmonic. Yes, that wasn't true before. In prior firmware versions tuning was not taken into account so that pitch shifts were detuned depending on how far the
Read more

Revised envelope shapes: inspired by Prophet 5 rev 1/2

Image
The upgraded Prophet 600 offers two envelope shapes: exponential and linear. These are software generated and in versions 2.0 and 2.1 RC3 they are really exactly that: a pure exponential shape and a pure linear shape. Some users argue that a musical choice is somewhere in between. To the ear, the exponential shape drops very quickly at the beginning and then it tails off long. The linear shape on the other hand is thicker in the early decay phase but then it drops hard to zero. The human ear is stunningly sensitive to envelope shapes, even at very low volumes. In a recent nice YouTube video Starsky Carr directly compares the Prophet 5 (rev 4) envelopes to the Prophet 600 addressing exactly this finding:  Prophet 600 vs Prophet 5 // Is the 600 a better value option? - YouTube Now: the 2022 firmware has completely revised linear decay and release shapes, which are linear at the start but then tail off smoothly. To some degree the shape was inspired by the Prophet 5 rev 1/2 envelope shape
Read more